Compared to predial servitude,the right to the use of cartilage is more close to servitus personarum in the purpose of legislation,the construction of right and act.

如果把农村宅基地使用权的质界定为地上权,将不得不度内部创设许多例外,这样就坏了地上权度本身的完整。

Compared to predial servitude,the right to the use of cartilage is more close to servitus personarum in the purpose of legislation,the construction of right and act.

如果把农村宅基权的性质界定为上权,将不得不在该制度内部创设许多例外,这样就坏了上权制度本身的完整性。

Compared to predial servitude,the right to the use of cartilage is more close to servitus personarum in the purpose of legislation,the construction of right and act.

如果把农村宅基地使用权性质界定为地上权,将不得不在该制度内许多例外,这样就坏了地上权制度完整性。

Compared to predial servitude,the right to the use of cartilage is more close to servitus personarum in the purpose of legislation,the construction of right and act.

如果把农村宅基地使用权质界定为地上权,将不得不在该制度内部创设许多例外,这样就坏了地上权制度本身完整。

Compared to predial servitude,the right to the use of cartilage is more close to servitus personarum in the purpose of legislation,the construction of right and act.

如果把农地使用权的性质界定为地上权,将不得不在该制度内创设许多例外,这样就坏了地上权制度本身的完整性。

Compared to predial servitude,the right to the use of cartilage is more close to servitus personarum in the purpose of legislation,the construction of right and act.

如果把农村宅基地使用权的性质界定为地上权,将不得不在该内部创例外,这样就坏了地上权身的完整性。

Compared to predial servitude,the right to the use of cartilage is more close to servitus personarum in the purpose of legislation,the construction of right and act.

如果把农村宅基地使用权的性质界定为地上权,将不得不在该制度内部创设许多外,这样就坏了地上权制度本身的完整性。

Compared to predial servitude,the right to the use of cartilage is more close to servitus personarum in the purpose of legislation,the construction of right and act.

如果把农村宅基地使用权的性质界定为地权,将不得不在该度内部创设许,这样就坏了地权度本身的完整性。

Compared to predial servitude,the right to the use of cartilage is more close to servitus personarum in the purpose of legislation,the construction of right and act.

如果把农村宅基地使用权的性质界定为地上权,将不得不在该内部创例外,这样就坏了地上权身的完整性。