Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和民族的劣根:狭隘国家主义、民族利己主义以及极端民族主义却成为其文化国际化走向中的根桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我国之所以出现立法上的偏差，与国家主义、析实证主义法学和法律工具主义文化心理在思想界的主导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和民族的劣根性:狭隘国家主义、民族利己主义以及极端民族主义却成为其文化国际化走向中的根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我国之所以出现立法上的偏差，与国家主义、分析实证主义法学和法律工具主义文化心理在思想界的主导地位有直接关。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和的劣根性:狭隘国家、己以及极端却成为其化国际化走向中的根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我国之所以出现立法上的偏差，与国家、分析实证法学和法律工具化心理在思想界的导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和族的劣根性:狭隘国家、族利己以及极端族却成为其国际走向中的根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我国之所以出现立法上的偏差，与国家、分析实证法学和法律工具理在思想界的导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和民族的劣根性:狭隘国家、民族利己及极端民族却成为其文化国际化走向中的根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我国之所出现立法上的偏差，与国家、分析实证法学和法具文化心理在思想界的导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大民族的劣根性:狭隘国家主、民族利己主极端民族主却成为其文化国际化走向中的根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我国之所出现立法上的偏差，与国家主、分析实证主法学法工具主文化心理在思想界的主导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和的劣根性:狭隘国家、利己以及极端却成为其文化国际化走向中的根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我国之所以出现立法上的偏差，与国家、分析实法学和法律工具文化心理在思想界的导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和民族:狭隘国家义、民族利己义以及极端民族义却成为其文化国际化走向中桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学度看，我国之所以出现立法上偏差，与国家义、分析实证义法学和法律工具义文化心理在思想导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和民族的劣根性:狭隘家主义、民族利己主义以及极端民族主义却成为其文化际化走向中的根性桎。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

法哲学的度看，我所以出现立法上的偏差，与家主义、分析实证主义法学和法律工具主义文化心理在思想界的主导地位有直接关系。