Immunologic characteristics of LPP antigen in this patient were investigated by indirect immunofluorescence immunoblotting and compared with bullous pemphigoid (BP) antigen.

通过免疫荧光和免疫印迹技术比较了LPP与类天疱疮（BP）抗原在一些免疫特方面的区别。

Methods By means of bicolour fluorescence and flow cytometry (FCM) analysis, the results were compared during different lay-out time, hemolysis time and washing time.

方法用双抗体双色免疫荧光记，流式细胞仪析，对本放置不同时间、溶血后洗涤前后的结果进行比较。

The DFA kit, however got a 88.8% and 100% of the sensitivity and specificity in the whole samples. And its sensitivity were higher in whichsoever (88.9% and 90.0%).

直接免疫荧光法总体敏感度和特异别为88.8%和100%,检测原发或复发感染敏感均较高(别为88.9%和90.0%)。

Immunologic characteristics of LPP antigen in this patient were investigated by indirect immunofluorescence immunoblotting and compared with bullous pemphigoid (BP) antigen.

通过免疫荧光和免疫印迹技术比较了LPP与类天疱疮（BP）抗原在一些免疫特方面的区别。

Methods By means of bicolour fluorescence and flow cytometry (FCM) analysis, the results were compared during different lay-out time, hemolysis time and washing time.

方法用双抗体双色免疫荧光记，流式细胞仪分析，对本放置不同时间、溶血后洗涤前后的结果进行比较。

The DFA kit, however got a 88.8% and 100% of the sensitivity and specificity in the whole samples. And its sensitivity were higher in whichsoever (88.9% and 90.0%).

直接免疫荧光法总体敏感度和特异分别为88.8%和100%,检测原发或复发感染敏感均较高(分别为88.9%和90.0%)。

Immunologic characteristics of LPP antigen in this patient were investigated by indirect immunofluorescence immunoblotting and compared with bullous pemphigoid (BP) antigen.

通过免疫荧光免疫印迹技术比较了LPP与类天疱疮（BP）抗些免疫性方面的区别。

Methods By means of bicolour fluorescence and flow cytometry (FCM) analysis, the results were compared during different lay-out time, hemolysis time and washing time.

方法用双抗体双色免疫荧光记，流式细胞仪分析，对本放置不同时间、溶血后洗涤前后的结果进行比较。

The DFA kit, however got a 88.8% and 100% of the sensitivity and specificity in the whole samples. And its sensitivity were higher in whichsoever (88.9% and 90.0%).

直接免疫荧光法总体敏感异性分别为88.8%100%,检测发或复发感染敏感性均较高(分别为88.9%90.0%)。

Immunologic characteristics of LPP antigen in this patient were investigated by indirect immunofluorescence immunoblotting and compared with bullous pemphigoid (BP) antigen.

通过免疫荧光和免疫印迹技术比较了LPP与类天疱疮（BP）抗原在一些免疫特性方面的区别。

Methods By means of bicolour fluorescence and flow cytometry (FCM) analysis, the results were compared during different lay-out time, hemolysis time and washing time.

方法用双抗体双色免疫荧光记，流式细胞仪，不同时间、溶血后洗涤前后的结果进行比较。

The DFA kit, however got a 88.8% and 100% of the sensitivity and specificity in the whole samples. And its sensitivity were higher in whichsoever (88.9% and 90.0%).

直接免疫荧光法总体敏感度和特异性别为88.8%和100%,检测原发或复发感染敏感性均较高(别为88.9%和90.0%)。

Immunologic characteristics of LPP antigen in this patient were investigated by indirect immunofluorescence immunoblotting and compared with bullous pemphigoid (BP) antigen.

通过免疫荧光和免疫印迹较了LPP与类天疱疮（BP）抗在一些免疫特性方面的区别。

Methods By means of bicolour fluorescence and flow cytometry (FCM) analysis, the results were compared during different lay-out time, hemolysis time and washing time.

方法用双抗体双色免疫荧光记，流式细胞仪分析，对本放置不同时间、溶血后洗涤前后的结果进行较。

The DFA kit, however got a 88.8% and 100% of the sensitivity and specificity in the whole samples. And its sensitivity were higher in whichsoever (88.9% and 90.0%).

直接免疫荧光法总体敏感度和特异性分别为88.8%和100%,检测复感染敏感性均较高(分别为88.9%和90.0%)。

Immunologic characteristics of LPP antigen in this patient were investigated by indirect immunofluorescence immunoblotting and compared with bullous pemphigoid (BP) antigen.

通过免疫荧光免疫印迹技术比较LPP天疱疮（BP）抗原在一些免疫特性方面的区别。

Methods By means of bicolour fluorescence and flow cytometry (FCM) analysis, the results were compared during different lay-out time, hemolysis time and washing time.

方法用双抗体双色免疫荧光记，流式细胞仪分析，对本放置不同时间、溶血后洗涤前后的结果进行比较。

The DFA kit, however got a 88.8% and 100% of the sensitivity and specificity in the whole samples. And its sensitivity were higher in whichsoever (88.9% and 90.0%).

直接免疫荧光法总体敏感度特异性分别88.8%100%,测原发或复发感染敏感性均较高(分别88.9%90.0%)。

Immunologic characteristics of LPP antigen in this patient were investigated by indirect immunofluorescence immunoblotting and compared with bullous pemphigoid (BP) antigen.

通过免疫荧和免疫印迹技术比较了LPP与类天疱疮（BP）抗原在一些免疫面的区别。

Methods By means of bicolour fluorescence and flow cytometry (FCM) analysis, the results were compared during different lay-out time, hemolysis time and washing time.

法用双抗体双色免疫荧记，流式细胞仪分析，对本放置不同时间、溶血后洗涤前后的结果进行比较。

The DFA kit, however got a 88.8% and 100% of the sensitivity and specificity in the whole samples. And its sensitivity were higher in whichsoever (88.9% and 90.0%).

直接免疫荧法体敏感度和异分别为88.8%和100%,检测原发或复发感染敏感均较高(分别为88.9%和90.0%)。

Immunologic characteristics of LPP antigen in this patient were investigated by indirect immunofluorescence immunoblotting and compared with bullous pemphigoid (BP) antigen.

通过免疫荧光免疫印迹技术比较LPP天疱疮（BP）抗原在一些免疫特性方面的区别。

Methods By means of bicolour fluorescence and flow cytometry (FCM) analysis, the results were compared during different lay-out time, hemolysis time and washing time.

方法用双抗体双色免疫荧光记，流式细胞仪分析，对本放置不同时间、溶血后洗涤前后的结果进行比较。

The DFA kit, however got a 88.8% and 100% of the sensitivity and specificity in the whole samples. And its sensitivity were higher in whichsoever (88.9% and 90.0%).

直接免疫荧光法总体敏感度特异性分别88.8%100%,测原发或复发感染敏感性均较高(分别88.9%90.0%)。

Immunologic characteristics of LPP antigen in this patient were investigated by indirect immunofluorescence immunoblotting and compared with bullous pemphigoid (BP) antigen.

通过光和印迹技术比较了LPP与类天疱疮（BP）抗原在一些特性方面的区别。

Methods By means of bicolour fluorescence and flow cytometry (FCM) analysis, the results were compared during different lay-out time, hemolysis time and washing time.

方法用双抗体双色光记，流式细胞仪分析，对本放置不同时间、溶血洗的结果进行比较。

The DFA kit, however got a 88.8% and 100% of the sensitivity and specificity in the whole samples. And its sensitivity were higher in whichsoever (88.9% and 90.0%).

直接光法总体敏感度和特异性分别为88.8%和100%,检测原发或复发感染敏感性均较高(分别为88.9%和90.0%)。