Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可
说
纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不
，
又如何解释呢？
声明：
上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分未经
人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以说这纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不过，以这些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分未经过人工审核，其
达内容亦不代
软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可
纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文「大展雄风」，不「大展雌风」一样。不，些又如何解释呢？
声明：上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分
人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以说
只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不过，以些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上例句、词性
类均由互联网资源自动生成，
经过人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可说纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不，又如何解释呢？
声明：上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分未经人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以说这纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不过，以这些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分未经过人工审核，其达内容亦不代软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以说这纯粹只是父权传
毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不过，以这些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上例句、词性分类均由互
源自动生成，部分未经过人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件
观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以说这纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不过，以这些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上
、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分未经过人工审核，其表
亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们
这纯粹只是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文「大展雄风」，不「大展雌风」一样。不，这些又如何解释呢？
声明：上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成，部分未
工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。
Why is it that a woman can man a station but a man can't woman one, that a man can father a movement but a woman can't mother one, and that a king rules a kingdom but a queen doesn't rule a queendom?
当然，我们可以说这
是父权传统的遗毒，就像中文说「大展雄风」，不说「大展雌风」一样。不过，以这些又如何解释呢？
声明：以上例句、词性类均由互联网资源自动生
，未经过人工审核，其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点；若发现问题，欢迎向我们指正。