It's quite transformative because in the past, the burden of proof lied with regulators, so they had to prove Facebook or Apple were breaking EU law, that they were undermining competitors.
So when all the available evidence suggests that humans are causing an increase in global temperatures, the burden of proof has been fulfilled— if you disagree, it becomes your responsibility to prove otherwise.
In a fundamental departure from the centuries-old traditions of Anglo-American law, the government need only make a superficial or prima facie case, based on gross numbers, to shift the burden of proof to the accused.