Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
一是不作为与行为
论,基于“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题,
于不作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如
进行合
说明。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
一是不作为与行为
论,基于“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题,
于不作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如
进行合
说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作为与行为理论,基于“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进行合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
不作为与行为理论,基于“犯罪
行为”这
刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作为行为性的结论
庸质疑,关键
如何对
进行合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作为与行为理论,基于“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作为行为性的结论应当毋,关键是如何对其进行合理说明。
声明:以上、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一为与行为理
,基于“犯罪
行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题,对于
为行为性的
当毋庸质疑,关键
如何对其进行合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其是不作
与行
理论,基于“犯罪是行
”
刑法学
验命题,对于不作
行
性
结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进行合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作为与行为理论,基“
是行为”这一刑法学中的先验命
,
不作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何
其进行合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作为与行为理论,基于“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进行合理说明。
声明:句、词性分类均由互联网资源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。
Since it is a priori proposition in the science of criminal law that a crime is a actus reus, omission undoubtedly has the nature of actus reus-the crux is to explain it reasonably.
其一是不作为与行为理论,基于“犯罪是行为”这一刑法学中的先验命题,对于不作为行为性的结论应当毋庸质疑,关键是如何对其进行合理说明。
声明:以上例句、词性分类均由互源自动生成,部分未经过人工审核,其表达内容亦不代表本软件的观点;若发现问题,欢迎向我们指正。