Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和民族的劣根性:狭隘家主义、民族利己主义以及极端民族主义却成为其文走向中的根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我之所以出现立法上的，家主义、分析实证主义法学和法律工具主义文心理在思想界的主导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和民族的劣:狭隘国家主义、民族利己主义及极端民族主义却成为其文化国际化走向中的梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我国之所立法上的偏差，与国家主义、分析实证主义法学和法律工具主义文化心理在思想界的主导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和民族的劣根:狭隘国家主义、民族利己主义以及极端民族主义却成为其文化国际化走向中的根桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我国之所以出现立法上的偏差，与国家主义、析实证主义法学和法律工具主义文化心理在思想界的主导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和民族的劣根性:家主义、民族利己主义以及极端民族主义却成为其文化际化走向中的根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我之所以出现立法上的偏差，与家主义、分析实证主义法学和法律工具主义文化心理界的主导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和民族的劣根性:狭隘国家主义、民族利己主义以及极端民族主义却成为其文化国际化走向中的根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我国之所以出现立法上的偏差，与国家主义、分析实证主义法学和法律工具主义文化心理在思想界的主导地位有直接。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但族的劣根性:狭隘国家主义、族利己主义以及极端族主义却成为其文化国际化走向中的根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我国之所以出现立法上的偏差，与国家主义、分析实证主义法学法律工具主义文化心理在思想界的主导地有接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大民族的劣根性:狭隘国家主义、民族利己主义以民族主义却成为其文化国际化走向中的根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲的度看，我国之所以出现立法上的偏差，与国家主义、分析实证主义法法律工具主义文化心理在思想界的主导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和民族劣根性:狭隘国家主义、民族利己主义以及极端民族主义却成为其文化国际化走根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学度看，我国之所以出现法偏差，与国家主义、分析实证主义法学和法律工具主义文化心理在思想界主导地位有直接关系。

Whereas the low-quality nature of Yamato such as narrow nationalism,national selfishness and ultranationalism becomes its root shackle in the process of globalization.

但大和民族的劣根性:狭隘家主义、民族利己主义以及极端民族主义却成为其文走向中的根性桎梏。

In terms of legal-philosophy, the IP system aberrancy of China can find a root in the dominance of nationalism, analytical-positivism law and instrumentalism in legal culture and mentality.

从法哲学的度看，我之所以出现立法上的，家主义、分析实证主义法学和法律工具主义文心理在思想界的主导地位有直接关系。