Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

法不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中法位置有多种。法位置不同，“兮”所表达语气是有区别。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同情况下具有度意义上不同,意义上不同制约着它们法功能不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可析这样一个发展过。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存在和一般生语法文献中所论述接应代词相同现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语某些法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中的法有多种。法不同，“兮”所表达的语气是有区别的。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同的情况下具有度意义上的不同,意义上的不同制约着它们法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的法变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存在和一般生成语法文献中所论述的接应代词相同的现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语的某些法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中的法置有多种。法置不同，“兮”所表达的语气是有区别的。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同的情况下具有度意义上的不同,意义上的不同制约着它们法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音词“得”的法演变经历了由词到次要词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存在和一般生成语法文献中所论述的接应代词相同的现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语的某些法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘“兮”《》中的句法位置有多种。句法位置不同，“兮”所表达的语气是有区别的。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,相同的情况下具有度意义上的不同,意义上的不同制约着它们句法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音词“得”的句法演变经历了由核心词到词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存和一般生成语法文献中所论述的接应代词相同的现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语的某些句法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘“”《楚辞》中的句法位置有多种。句法位置不同，“”所表达的语气是有区别的。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式态形容词,相同的情况下具有度意义上的不同,意义上的不同制约着它们句法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音词“得”的句法演变经历了由核心词到次词、语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存和一般生成语法文献中所论述的接应代词相同的现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语的某些句法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中句法位置有多种。句法位置同，“兮”所表达语有区别。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同情况下具有度意义上同,意义上同制约着它们句法功同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”句法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内可分析成分这样一个发展过。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并存在和一般生成语法文献中所论述接应代词相同现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语某些句法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法不往往给语言学习者带来困难。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中句法位置有多种。句法位置不，“兮”所表达语气是有区别。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

ABB式状态形容词,在相情况下具有度意义上不,意义上不制约句法功能不。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”句法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析成分这样一个发展过。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存在和一般生成语法文献中所论述接应代词相现象，进而帮助我深入认识汉语某些句法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的不同往往给语言学习者带来困难。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中的句法位置有多种。句法位置不同，“兮”所表达的语气有别的。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同的情况下具有度意义上的不同,意义上的不同制约着它们句法的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的句法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语和补语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存在和一般生成语法文献中所论述的接应代词相同的现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语的某些句法性质。

Syntactic differences often present the learner with difficulties.

句法的不同往往给语言学习者带。

There are many kinds of syntaxon positions on xi in Chuci, For different syntaxon positions, the voice of xi is also different.

摘要“兮”在《楚辞》中的句法位置有多种。句法位置不同，“兮”所表达的语气是有区别的。

Under the same circumstances, the statal adjectives of the ABB pattern are different in degree and their syntactic functions are conditioned by difference in meaning.

同根ABB式状态形容词,在相同的情况下具有度意义上的不同,意义上的不同制约着它们句法功能的不同。

The syntactic evolvement of the verb "de" has gone through a lot of stages from a core verb to an inapprehensible element in the word.

单音动词“得”的句法演变经历了由核心动词到次要动词、状语语、结构助词,再到词内不可分析的成分这样一个发展过。

The two main principles of the theory adopted in this paper are the Subjacency condition and the ECP, which will help us to know better of the idea we are introducing here.

本文认为汉语中并不存在一般生成语法文献中所论述的接应代词相同的现象，进而帮助我们深入认识汉语的某些句法性质。